SSブログ

The Liberals propose to drop the exception.


Right now, the Supreme Court of Canada is the only federally-appointed court that is exempt from the Official Languages Act which says all Canadians must be able to access services in federal courts in either English or French. In other words, it puts the onus on federal courts to provide bilingual services, not on prime ministers to appoint only 우리카지노 bilingual judges. The Liberals propose to drop the exception.

Trudeau does not intend to change the Supreme Court Act which sets out the eligibility criteria for judicial appointments to the top court.

Rachel Rappaport, a spokesperson for Justice Minister David Lametti, says the bilingual services exemption for the Supreme Court “was never intended to be permanent.”

YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN...
‘Makes no sense’: Archbishop slams COVID restrictions that allow more people inside a liquor store than a church funeral
GTA
‘Makes no sense’: Archbishop slams COVID restrictions that allow more people inside a liquor store than a church funeral
24 hrs ago
‘Bringing out the cudgels’: How one of Ontario’s top landlords weathered the pandemic and fought back when retailers refused to pay their rent
BUSINESS
‘Bringing out the cudgels’: How one of Ontario’s top landlords weathered the pandemic and fought back when retailers refused to pay their rent
1 day ago
In 1988 Conservative justice minister Ray Hnatyshyn said during debates on the Official Languages Act that, “It is probably in the national interest at this time that we not put any constraints on the court in the way in which it does its business.” He said that “until we reach a more developed stage of bilingualism across the country,” governments should be able pick from among “the best people who are unilingual, in both languages.”

There have been at least 10 bills introduced over the past 10 years to require top judges be bilingual, according to Jean-Christophe Bédard-Rubin, a doctoral candidate at University of Toronto’s faculty of law. None has passed.카지노사이트

But unilingualism has had an impact, says Bédard-Rubin, who with a colleague has done the first empirical study of the impact of unilingualism on the Supreme Court’s operations.
nice!(0)  コメント(1) 

the AfD for "Noometry",

I discovered my way into this by means ofwhich highlighted this string at WikiProject Medicine. XOR'easter (talk) 13:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC) 우리카지노

I made Noogenesis into a divert yet was returned; in all honesty, it's a trash article and something should be done about it. XOR'easter (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

It's essentially that "Omega Point" drivel once more. The idiotic and silly teleological contention redivivus as immense charm. What a wreck! Different subjects referenced in that conversation I have not taken a gander at however are without a doubt magnets for edge of this sort. GPinkerton (talk) 00:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

"Noometry" was erased however different articles actually need consideration. XOR'easter (talk) 20:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Anybody want to take the altering blade to noogenesis? There's potentially some material of chronicled interest close to the start, however all that begins with "Ongoing turns of events" peruses like Ray Kurzweil machine-converted into Russian and back and wikified affected by an honorable bong hit or three. XOR'easter (talk) 05:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for erasure/Noogenesis. jps (talk) 23:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

A debt of gratitude is in order for posting that; I need to for the most part step away for some time (no an ideal opportunity for content work, no energy for in the background debates), however I left a !vote. XOR'easter (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for erasure/Information nature jps (talk) 23:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for erasure/Alexei Eryomin jps (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Plate hypothesis (volcanism)

There has been a broad conversation about the Plate hypothesis (volcanism) article at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Geology#Plate_theory_(volcanism). "Plate Theory" appears to a minority see in scholarly geography that mantle tufts aren't genuine marvel and that all volcanism, even those away from plate limits can be totally clarified by plate tectonics. The primary advertiser of this hypothesis has all the earmarks of being Professor Gillian Foulger of Durham University, a regarded scholastic. For something as perplexing as mantle geophysics its hard to get a feeling of how genuinely this thought is taken by the more extensive scholarly local area (her book on the subject "Plates versus crest: a topographical debate" from 2011 has been refered to more than 200 times). The way things are the article seems like to me (and numerous different donors at WikiProject Geology) to be a WP:POVFORK that ought to be specifically converged into another article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

As an aside, the other significant advertiser of "plate hypothesis", the currently expired Don L. Anderson has for the most part been added to by the SPA Annehand, and incorporates huge segments of uncited text and puffery, depicting his course readings as "viewed by partners as convincing combinations of the inceptions of the Earth and its inward operations by one of the incredible geophysical specialists within recent memory." Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The designer of the Plate hypothesis (volcanism) article SphericalSong (talk · contribs · logs · alter channel log · block log) has additionally broadly revised around twelve diverse Hotspot (geography) related articles, attempting to project question about the mantle tuft hypothesis and advancing the "plate hypothesis", see diffs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10, a significant number of them refer to "mantleplumes.org (the fundamental site for the "plate hypothesis" allies, run by Foulger, which gazes directly out of a mid 2000's geocities page) and the "Plates versus crest: a geographical debate" book by Foulger. I'm uncertain that this is in-accordance with our periphery and NPOV approaches. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 카지노사이트

Kent G. Move has shown that Foulger herself is likely behind this exertion, as she seemed to face him when he made the Intraplate volcanism article from combining the Plate hypothesis (volcanism) article, making him erase the new aritlce. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

As an obvious WP:POV push, I have returned their alters where they embed bogus equilibrium for their pet hypothesis (aside from this, which looks complex; I'll let topography editors handle that). This positively wouldn't be the first occasion when that a scientist comes to Wikipedia to embed their minority see as truth. Intersection - talk-20:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Better believe it, that definite looks POV to me. Given that it isn't the generally acknowledged clarification for volcanism, its absence of any analysis, or even of the presence of different models, is glaring, similar to the webpage spam contained inside the article - "Since 2003, conversation and advancement of the plate hypothesis has been cultivated by the Durham University(UK)- facilitated site mantleplumes.org, a significant global discussion with commitments from geoscientists working in a wide assortment of claims to fame." This has each appearance of a purposeful exertion to advance a pet hypothesis. Agricolae (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The more I search on researcher, the more I believe that WP:MEDRS like rules ought to apply to this subject. It's exceptionally simple to bring up many examinations supporting "plate hypothesis" by similar restricted gathering of allies, yet there are effectively a large number of papers supporting the presence of mantle tufts. This Earth Magazine article is a fascinating outline of the set of experiences behind mantle crest and the contention encompassing them. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

There is the WP:SCIRS page, however it's just a paper. Maybe it ought to develop into something else.
nice!(0)  コメント(0) 

역사는 어디에서 시작됩니까?

La Tène 문화는 BC 500 년경부터 AD 100 년경까지 계속되는 문화입니다. 그것은 La Tène시 (오늘날, Neuchâtel에 가까운 Marin-Epagnier)의 이름을 따서 명명되었습니다. 그것은 로마와 그리스 사회의 영향을 받았습니다. 이를위한 두 가지 핫스팟이 있습니다.바카라사이트

그곳에서 발견 된 아이템 [24]

로마인과 그리스인은 삶의 방식과 상호 작용했습니다. 그들은 원칙적으로 그들을 켈트족이라고 불렀습니다. 그들은 그들에 대해 설명했습니다. 그들에 대한 주요 작품은 Julius Caesar가 작곡했습니다. 갈릭 전쟁 (De bello gallico)에 접근합니다.

켈트족은 근본적으로 그룹으로 살았습니다. 모든 가족은 Druids 또는 Bards에서 온 개척자가 가고있었습니다. 숙녀는 로마인보다 훨씬 우월했으며 사실상 남성과 동등했습니다. 일부 다처제와 일부 다처제가 있었다 (남자는 여자 몇 명, 여자는 남자 몇 명).온라인카지노

일 리리아

nice!(0)  コメント(0) 

この広告は前回の更新から一定期間経過したブログに表示されています。更新すると自動で解除されます。